For a while now, the schizophrenic me personally has been debating the implications of nominal laissez-faire and real designs in the financial plan sphere (stoked by ‘Faith in an Unregulated Free Market? Don’t Fall for It’: New York Times). Remove barriers to entrance, lower corporate fees, permit free flow of capital, and what you have is a nominal utopia that acts the people and elevates their immediate state of pleasure.
But has the reality of laissez faire conformed with targets? Must we, this day and age of fast technological innovations in, trade off employment for a cleaner society yet? Must we await a generation that is repulsed by the environmental damage from earlier generations before real remediation policies are implemented? If competition, free markets, and democracy haven’t neutralized the ever-perpetuating and exacerbating excesses of the nominal paradigm, what can? Politicians, much less economists, are loathe to confess that the Real paradigm is a credible and natural option to the Nominal. What would such arrangements have the peoples of varied nations?
The freedom to choose between a local nominal economy operating parallel for an internationally-mediated, real culture, albeit nationally-differentiated. The chance to unabashedly pursue the Nominal aware that it’s excesses would be countered, if not expected, by the true. The chance to make a difference to the social people of a trading partner, while pursuing nominal opportunities in that nation simultaneously. But more than anything else, the methods to pursue their strategic and social, long objectives unobstructed by nominal designs of the Private within the ambit of traditions, religion, culture, and principles – a goal subverted by the Nominal.
- Upon viewing the rip in the painting I shed a rip
- Tax implications and accounting criteria used
- Property confiscated under color of law
- Quantitative Valuation and Performance Metrics
Economists have, for long, been the friends of the Private, the Nominal, and the laissez faire, and the results of such subservience to the Rich and powerful are around us – diabetic economists including! It’s time we as a profession own up to our short-sightedness and selfish pursuits bordering on greed and suggest those politically-empowered to pursue a socially-efficient, and just paradigm environmentally.
Rs. 37,500 in those months. The majority rebate for the six months to 31st March 1999 was received in April 1999 and amounted to Rs. 4,100 in respect of purchases from Tee Ltd. Rs. 3,800 in respect of purchases from Dee Ltd. Arvind offers all goods at a cost gives a gross profit equal to 25% of the cost of goods, before deducting either the money discount or the bulk rebate. Information from paid checks and bank or investment company statements showed bank or investment company debris from sale of Rs. 1,62,362, general overheads of Rs.
27,452 and two quarterly rent obligations of Rs. Fixtures which cost Rs. 8,000 and vehicles which cost Rs. 7,600 are to be depreciated at the rate of 15% and 25 percent25 % per annum respectively. In January 1999 Arvind used wall structure paper which cost before deducting either the majority rebate or the money discount Rs. 180 in decorating his own house.
The stock kept by Arvind on 30th September 1998 had a price before deduction of any rebates or discount rates of Rs. Green, Blue, and Yellow Ltd. On 1st December 1999 Green and Yellow retired and Blue Ltd. Blue Ltd. paid Rs. 18,00,000 to Green and Rs. 18,00,000 to Yellow in last and full release of their state in the partnership. This amount was brought in by Blue Ltd.
None of the asset and liabilities are to be revalued. Being capital earned by Blue Ltd. Being purchase by Blue Ltd. Ashoka Ltd. was integrated on l. 999 with an authorized capital of Rs. 25 crores. The clients to the memorandum and articles of association subscribed for 1000 equity stocks of Rs. 10 each. The promoters and well wishers paid and subscribed for Rs. 4,99,000 equity shares of Rs. 10 each. The company took over working business of Magadha Bros. 15,00,000 equity shares of Rs. 10 each at par.
The company made a public open problem of 80,00,000 equity stocks of Rs. 10 each at par, Rs. 5 being payable on the program, Rs. 3 on allotment and Rs. Public requested in full. Allotment monies were received from all users except holders of 500 shares. Call monies were received from all members except holders of 800 shares (including those who had not paid allotment monies). Alter due notice, the 800 stocks were forfeited on 30.9.1999. These were reissued on 31.10.1999 at Rs. 30.11.1999 of the ongoing company.